Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

For Lack of What is Found There

It is difficult
To get the news from Poems
but men have died miserably everyday
for lack
of what is found there

Took the girls to the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem yesterday. Two exhibits utterly transformed me. I spend so much time worrying about politics, duty, the fate of the world, that even though at this point in my life I'm the child of two artists, I have been unable to immerse myself in the here and now of art and experience to the full the true joy of being human. The first exhibit was a hands on exploration of origami and its world. The second was "Body Politic, Maori Tatoos today".

In my more despairingly calvinist moments the thought of people devoting their lives to origami would strike me as another sign of the wasteful excess of modern consumer culture--for g-d's sake don't people who buy those little origami kits know that someone is starving somewhere? But face to face with the astonishing creations, and watching a short film on some of the artists, I became enraptured with our human ability to fashion beauty and to explore space and nature even in the face of the chaos and fear of our everyday lives. The artists ranged from a guy who had two degrees from cal tech and had worked for NASA and abandoned everything to "fold paper" to a wonderful woman who had "dedicated her life to the children" and to "peace" and used origami as a way of bringing Palestinian and Israeli children together. The exhibit contained pieces, such as a kraken swallowing a three masted schooner, folded and then molded by dampening the paper, from a single six foot sheet of paper. The artist's folding design, a highly mathematical blueprint of the creases and folds, lay next to it. Another was a full sized pangolin folded from another single sheet of paper, perfect in every scale. Still another was a single piece of folded silk, carefully folded into a tessalated moorish design. Backlit the warp and woof constitute the pattern.

One of the artists spoke about how, to his eye, everything is folds--from the mountains and hills around us, to the creases of our own skin. A baby, to his mind, unfolds. Everything can be seen as a surface, or set of surfaces.

Which takes me to the next exhibit. Maori body tatoos were banned by the white colonial authorities from (?) 1840-1962 (?) and preserved by only a few old women who, presumably, no one bothered to arrest. After 1962 criminal gangs began to use them but eventually through a process of self rediscovery and indigneous pride the elders of the community and the leaders of the various clans and families recaptured control and have begun the process of turning facial and body tatoos (moko) back into a serious form of self discipline and ethnic pride. It was an intimate and powerful exhibit since the participants were asked not just to allow their photographs to be taken but also to put up a statement about what their moko meant to them. They agreed on condition that the exhibit would serve as a kind of public prayer for the return of the various severed and mummified Maori heads which were taken from New Zealand and collected in museums around the world.

Putting on moko is a highly complex act--one part rebellion, one part self assertion in a hostile world, one part zen like discipline. Many of the subjects talked about assuming moko as (to their mind) an out of control young man in a gang but later learning to use it as a form of bodily and spiritual self discipline. Many spoke of how, by externalizing their Maori heritage onto their skin, they found themselves no longer able to move invisibly or humbly through their interactions with other Maori or non Maori. They said that their moko had given them an inner discipline because it drew attention to them and to their behavior. Sometimes young people took moko, with their elders' approval. And in some cases very old people were taking moko, in order to support the choices made by those younger than them. there is a whole Rasta community of Maori whose statements were simply pieces of the old or new testament.

Both these forms of art created new communities for the people participating in them. Both are art forms of the skin, or surface. Both were, for their participants, almost a form of meditation or communication. To go from one exhibit to the other was to grasp, for a second, how important art is to human existence. Its not something that we can or should forgo in pursuit of "higher" or even more "necessary" political goals. Its something we can't do without, even if we do it on the edge of a precipice.

aimai

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Resurwreckage

Resurwreckage
Judith Schaechter, 2001; at the De Young Museum.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

The Russian Bride Attires

The Russian Bride's Attire
Konstantin Makovsky, 1889; at the Legion of Honor. This is one of my favorite paintings at the Legion.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

The Three Shades

The Three Shades
Shadow of a Rodin sculpture at the Legion of Honor.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Embarcadero and Clay Street

Embarcadero and Clay Street
John Langley Howard, 1935, at the De Young Museum. Howard's most famous works were [edit: some of] the murals in a well-known shrine to Liberal Fascism.

The intersection shown here no longer exists. When the Embarcadero Center was built (ca. 1970), it cut off Clay just past Drumm. In the '60s, they built the Embarcadero Freeway, with an off on-ramp ending beginning right about here; after the Loma Prieta quake it was torn down, thanks to the vision of Mayor Agnos. The only element of continuity with the present day is the building in the background, One Market, seen here from the opposite angle:

Reflection

Update: post revised upon clearer recollection of the geography. Also, I think it was the freeway rather than Embarcadero Center that originally cut off Clay from Embarcadero; Clay fed directly onto the freeway rather than going through. When they took down the freeway, they left Clay as a dead end.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

d. April 22, 1994


Painting by Max Hilton-Gray

For years, rumors have swirled around my supposed involvement in the death of Richard Nixon. There are countless variations, but the basic version is this: that someone asked me what I wanted for my birthday, and I said "I want Richard Nixon dead". In the hope of putting these rumors to rest, let me say now: to the best of my knowledge, I had nothing at all to do with Nixon's death, which I believe to have been from natural causes.

Nixon was, however, the first politician I can really remember hating. He was paranoid, vindictive, corrupt, obsessed with secrecy, and more than a little in love with power. He did tremendous damage to the basic structures of democratic rule, and he would have done more if he could have gotten away with it.

Just for perspective, though, it's worth noting (as Atrios reminds us) that

whatever his flaws, Nixon was a giant of a man compared with the doofus currently occupying the White House.
Which is the saddest part of the whole thing.

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Back to the DeYoung


I went back to the DeYoung Museum last Sunday morning, which we don't do nearly enough considering we're members and all. I got there right at opening time, so (as you can see) not a lot of crowds.

The marquee exhibit, a Vivienne Westwood retrospective, was interesting but I wasn't enthralled--not enough to have paid the $5 extra for it if I hadn't been a member. It cheesed me off right at the start, when a background panel explained that Westwood and (her husband) Malcolm McLaren had 'invented punk'. That makes sense if you're looking through the wrong end of the telescope--that is, if by 'punk' you mean not punk itself but 'punk fashion'. (Generations of DIY musicians have the Ramones to thank; suburban kids who stuck safety pins in their t-shirts can thank Vivienne Westwood.) One line did make me laugh out loud, in the notes for a display of enormous (as in acreage) flowing dresses: 'the sheer volume of the dress empowers the wearer'. Somehow a dress so vast that the wearer can do nothing but drape herself decoratively over the furniture doesn't strike me as all that empowering. But of course this is what fashionspeak does: it takes the aggressively superficial and repackages it as Important. In the end, it's all just a lot of clothes.

The coolest exhibit was one called Average Landscapes, by Elliot Anderson. Anderson started with Hudson River school landscapes in the DeYoung collection, searched for uploaded images with the same title or description, and superimposed as many as 500 images to create a sort of ghostly composite of a given landscape. I couldn't get a decent picture of them, unfortunately; you really have to see them in person.


I also loved the exhibit of recent prints by Deborah Oropallo (including George, above) that "layer images of contemporary women in provocative costumes, borrowed from the Internet, with images of men from 17th- and 18th-century portrait paintings" (description lifted from the DeYoung website). The effect is alternately disorienting, creepy, and amusing.


These Ruth Osawa sculptures are in the permanent collection, at the base of the tower. I love the shadows they cast.



Then there's your basic 19th century Gringolandian stuff, which is really pretty (and I know that sounds like an insult, but I don't mean it that way).


Including, of course, my favorite Frederick Church.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

DeYoung Museum

Now that I've posted a good set of thoroughly depressing political posts, it's time for something a little more frivolous: pictures from the (newly remodeled) DeYoung Museum. They're not as good as I had hoped--no flash allowed, understandably, so they tend to be a little on the fuzzy side--but I figured a few were worth sharing here.

Teardrops
This is one of my favorite pieces, just gorgeous in person. Photo doesn't do it justice, etc.

DeYoung Stairs
I'm ambivalent about the exterior of the DeYoung (it's really ugly from JFK Drive, but looks a lot better from the Concourse), but I love the interior. This is the main stairwell to the lower level. Yes, I know it's sideways; I think it looks cooler that way. The light well at the top of the picture is filled with ferns and slaty hillocks, a tiny bit of captive wilderness in the middle of the museum.

Desk
My initial goal was to catch the International Arts & Crafts exhibit before it goes away (next weekend). Unfortunately, it's a copyrighted exhibit, so they weren't allowing any photos at all. I got this one before the guard told me. It's an ingenious sort of escritoire, with a desk that folds down and a chair that tucks neatly into the structure.

Fingerpointing
I thought this one was kind of amusing.

Charcoal
This one is very powerful in person. It's composed of hanging pieces of charred wood from a church fire down South. It gives the whole room a very sombre feeling.

Map TouristsThe tower has this awesome composite aerial photomap of San Francisco. Here's a closer view of the Golden Gate.

[Cross-posted at Property of a Lady]

[That's all, folks]